ArticleCanadian liver journal2025
Validation of FIB-4 for the Diagnosis of Liver Cirrhosis in Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease.
Article in Canadian liver journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- FIB-4 Index as a Non-Invasive Biomarker of Congestion and Prognosis in Heart Failure.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Association of the Fibrosis-4 Index With Indices of Atherosclerosis in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: An Exploratory Subanalysis of a Prospective Observational Cohort Study.Journal of diabetes research · 2026Observational
- BIGH3 as a potential biomarker for fibrosis in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: insights from mouse and human studies.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases practice guidance on metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) has recommended using specific cut-off values for the Fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) to detect cirrhosis. A cut-off of 3.48 is recommended for identifying stage 4 fibrosis (F4) with high specificity, while a cut-off of 1.67 is suggested for ruling out advanced fibrosis. Our study aimed to validate the diagnostic performance of these new FIB-4 cut-offs in our cohort of biopsy-proven MASLD from two Canadian tertiary care centres. Our study included 390 patients with biopsy-proven MASLD with F4 prevalence of 22%. Among the 87 patients with cirrhosis, 37 (42.5%) were correctly identified with a FIB-4 ≥3.48. FIB-4 had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.79 at the proposed cut-off points, with 32% of patients being indeterminate or misclassified. Sensitivity and positive-predictive value for the FIB-4 cut-off were 65% and 68.5%, respectively, while the specificity and negative-predictive value were 93% and 92%, respectively. In conclusion, in our biopsy-proven MASLD cohort, recommended FIB-4 cut-offs ≥3.48 and <1.67 had low sensitivity but high specificity. An upper FIB-4 cut-off of 3.48 would have missed nearly one in four cirrhosis cases. The proposed FIB-4 thresholds for identifying F4 in MASLD patients have limited diagnostic utility in higher prevalence tertiary hepatology cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.