ReviewOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2025
Trends in antimicrobial resistance education research: a bibliometric analysis.
Review in One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses a severe public health threat, with educational interventions recognized as pivotal in mitigating its impact. The World Health Organization (WHO) Global Action Plan on AMR emphasizes awareness and education as fundamental strategies. Given the complex interplay between human, animal, and environmental health in the development and spread of AMR, educational initiatives are increasingly being framed within a One Health approach. This study aims to examine the scientific production on AMR education of healthcare professionals and the general population. Methods: A bibliometric analysis was performed on AMR education literature on the Web of Science Core Collection database up to December 2023. Using the Biblioshiny tool within the Bibliometrix R package, the analysis covered productivity metrics, citation impact, keyword co-occurrence, and thematic mapping. Results: The study analyzed 1124 documents published on AMR education between 1995 and 2023, with a 20.5 % annual growth in publications. Key journals included Conclusions: The expansion of AMR education research reflects growing global commitment to combating AMR through targeted educational strategies. Framing AMR education within the One Health approach may enhance its effectiveness, by addressing the interconnected drivers of resistance across sectors. Our findings highlight the importance of sustaining international collaboration and aligning AMR educational efforts with national policies. Future research should emphasize interdisciplinary approaches and innovative methods to address the complex challenges of AMR across diverse populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.