ArticleLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2025
Exploratory Qualitative Analysis of Needs Assessment and Obstacles Faced by Head and Neck Cancer Patients in Central Pennsylvania.
Article in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exploratory Qualitative Analysis of Needs Assessment and Obstacles Faced by Head and Neck Cancer Patients in Central Pennsylvania.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: We sought to identify the needs and obstacles in a rural head and neck cancer (HNC) patient population to address potential gaps in healthcare delivery and resources for this patient population. Methods: Thirty-minute semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 HNC patients. Verbatim transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis. A conceptual framework adapted from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine's five healthcare activities was used. Results: Three themes emerged highlighting the importance of care coordination between treatment facilities, prioritizing quality of life metrics, and emphasizing patients' desire to be treated close to home. Conclusion: This study identified several important themes that should be prioritized when implementing a successful multidisciplinary HNC center. Patients highly value communication among treatment teams, emphasizing the benefits of the role of a cancer nurse coordinator who can serve as the primary liaison for patients and ensure their needs are addressed. Level of Evidence: 6.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.