Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40677916›Full record

ArticleNAR genomics and bioinformatics2025

Modeling RNA duplex dynamics with Gibbs sampling enhances base-pair prediction accuracy and reveals structural activity profiles.

Simon Chasles, François Major

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NAR genomics and bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Simon ChaslesDepartment of Computer Science and Operations Research, and Institute for Research in Immunology and Cancer, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec H3C 3J7, Canada.
François MajorDepartment of Computer Science and Operations Research, and Institute for Research in Immunology and Cancer, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec H3C 3J7, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1743-0480

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The RNA secondary (2D) structure prediction problem consists in determining the set of base pairs that form within an RNA molecule from its sequence. A related task is the RNA hybridization problem, where two RNA strands interact to form a duplex. Thermodynamics-based methods typically rely on experimentally determined energy parameters to compute minimum free energy structures for both single-stranded RNAs and duplexes. Through the Boltzmann distribution, these parameters can be used to estimate base-pairing probabilities. Here, we leverage these probabilities to simulate RNA:RNA interaction dynamics. Inspired by the Ising model, we apply Gibbs sampling to model the stochastic formation and disruption of base pairs over time in RNA duplexes, ultimately deriving a consensus structure. The resulting method, MC-DuplexFold (mcdf), enhances base-pair prediction accuracy when integrated with other RNA 2D structure prediction algorithms. Through benchmarking, we reaffirm the previously observed trend that approximate or heuristic methods, such as RIsearch and Sfold, outperform exact methods like RNAcofold and DuplexFold in structural prediction accuracy. Additionally, mcdf provides structural activity statistics that can be incorporated into the modeling of miRNA primary transcripts, precursors, and target interactions, thereby refining predictions of miRNA:mRNA duplex dynamics.

Indexed as

Base PairingRNAAlgorithmsMicroRNAsNucleic Acid ConformationThermodynamicsMicroRNAsRNA

Identifiers

PMID40677916
PMCPMC12267985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.