ArticleJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2025
Surgical management of severe neglected adult idiopathic scoliosis: A review article on challenges and contemporary treatment strategies.
Article in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Decision-Making in the Surgical Management of Rigid Congenital Spinal Deformities: The Role of Vertebral Column Resection and Less Invasive Alternatives.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neglected adult idiopathic scoliosis (NAdIS) is a spinal deformity characterized by severe rigidity and multiplanar curvature, significantly impairing pain levels, physical function, and health-related quality of life. Its complexity is heightened by longstanding vertebral malalignment, cardiopulmonary compromise, and age-related comorbidities, making surgical management particularly challenging. Despite progress in spinal deformity correction, consensus remains lacking on the optimal treatment strategy for these patients. This narrative review synthesizes contemporary surgical options for NAdIS, including posterior spinal fusion (PSF), posterior column osteotomy (PCO), halo-gravity traction (HGT), temporary internal distraction (TID), vertebral column resection (VCR), anterior release, multilevel lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF), and novel posterior-only techniques such as posterolateral convex discectomy (PCDR) and intervertebral release (IVR). A structured decision-making framework is proposed, taking into account curve severity, location, flexibility, and patient-specific factors. Each technique offers unique advantages and limitations. PSF remains the foundational method for moderate, flexible curves. HGT is a valuable adjunct for enhancing spinal flexibility and pulmonary function in severe cases. TID provides a staged, safer alternative to VCR, enabling gradual correction while preserving spinal cord perfusion. VCR, although powerful for three-dimensional deformity correction, carries high morbidity and is generally reserved for rigid, sharply angulated curves. Anterior release retains value in select thoracic deformities, particularly those with anterior bridging or hypokyphosis. LLIF enables effective coronal realignment and vertebral derotation in thoracolumbar curves with preserved disc mobility. Posterior-only techniques such as PCDR and IVR have emerged as viable, less invasive alternatives to anterior release, especially when used at multiple apical levels. Recent advancements in technology-including 3D printing, intraoperative navigation, and robotic-assisted instrumentation-have further refined surgical planning and execution, offering enhanced accuracy and reduced complication rates. These tools are especially useful in navigating complex spinal anatomy and minimizing neurologic risk. The management of NAdIS necessitates a stepwise, individualized surgical strategy that balances deformity correction with patient safety and functional goals. While posterior-based approaches dominate current practice, selected cases benefit from anterior, staged, or combined interventions based on specific anatomical and physiological considerations. Future progress in the treatment of NAdIS will depend on the continued refinement of evidence-based algorithms and broader integration of enabling technologies. This review aims to support spine surgeons in delivering safe, personalized, and effective care for this uniquely challenging patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.