ArticleComplex psychiatry
Leveraging Natural Language Processing for Psychiatric Phenotyping from Spanish Electronic Health Records: Enabling the Investigation of Transdiagnostic Symptom Profiles at Scale.
Article in Complex psychiatry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Large Language Models for Psychiatric Phenotype Extraction from Electronic Health Records.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Clinical notes in electronic health records offer valuable insight into the symptom profiles and trajectories of patients with severe mental illness (SMI). However, systematically extracting symptoms at scale remains a challenge, especially in languages other than English. We developed a light, accurate, and interpretable natural language processing (NLP) algorithm to extract psychiatric phenotypes from Spanish clinical notes. Methods: We selected a set of 136 core psychiatric phenotypes and annotated 4,000 clinical note sections (e.g., Chief Complaint, Plan; called "documents") and 240 complete visit notes (called "entries") from two psychiatric hospitals in Colombia: Hospital Mental de Antioquia (HOMO) and Clínica San Juan de Dios Manizales (CSJDM). For phenotypes meeting frequency and inter-annotator reliability thresholds, we developed three NLP algorithms (HOMO, CSJDM, and COMBINED) for phenotype extraction and context labeling (e.g., negation, family history, uncertainty). We evaluated performance at the document and entry levels, as well as across hospitals. Results: Document-level performance at both hospitals was high (average F1 scores of 0.84 and 0.85). Moreover, on phenotypes meeting our document-level performance threshold of F1 ≥0.7, entry-level performance was high as well (average F1 of 0.75 and 0.78), as was the cross-hospital transportability of the algorithms (F1 of 0.75 HOMO-to-CSJDM and 0.77 CSJDM-to-HOMO). The COMBINED algorithm improved overall recall, without significantly decreasing precision (F1 of 0.78 and 0.77 on HOMO and CSJDM, respectively). The application of our algorithm for 50 high-performing phenotypes to the notes of 9,737 SMI patients highlighted the transdiagnostic nature of many core SMI phenotypes; 44/50 phenotypes were recorded in over 10% of patients across diagnoses. Multiple correspondence analysis further revealed variation in symptom space across diagnoses; while major depressive disorder and schizophrenia form distinct clusters, patients with bipolar disorder span the entire phenotypic spectrum. Conclusion: Our tool enables the systematic investigation of psychiatric symptoms from psychiatric notes, facilitating large-scale investigations in Spanish-speaking populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.