ArticleBiomedical optics express2025
Standardizing image acquisition and processing methods: a critical need for the accurate assessment of retinal blood vessel tortuosity.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Retinal vascular tortuosity is a biomarker associated with various retinal and systemic diseases. However, its clinical application is hindered by the lack of an objective, standardized definition. With the growing number of automated pipelines for the evaluation of tortuosity from retinal images, the impact of image processing, choice of tortuosity index, and retinal camera imaging parameters have been overlooked. This study assesses the robustness of different tortuosity indices to artificial changes in camera imaging parameters and the choice of centerline extraction algorithm to provide a path toward standardization of tortuosity quantification. Five tortuosity indices were implemented and tested on tortuosity-ordered vessel segments using Spearman's Rank Correlation Coefficients for comparison. Comparable results were obtained for all tested indices. Image magnification was found to have minor or no impact on the most tested indices. A key finding from this study is that the same blood vessel imaged in different regions of the field of view of the same imaging system may differ in measured tortuosity. Different centerline extraction algorithms were also found to have a critical impact on tortuosity quantification. Taken as a whole, this study shows the importance of standardizing the analytical procedures in the evaluation of blood vessel tortuosity.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.