Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40677804›Full record

ArticleJournal of intelligent manufacturing2025

Multi-channel anomaly detection using graphical models.

Bernadin Namoano, Christina Latsou, John Ahmet Erkoyuncu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of intelligent manufacturing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bernadin NamoanoCentre of Digital Engineering and Manufacturing, Cranfield University, College Rd, Wharley End, Bedford, MK43 0AL UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6159-5250
Christina LatsouCentre of Digital Engineering and Manufacturing, Cranfield University, College Rd, Wharley End, Bedford, MK43 0AL UK.
John Ahmet ErkoyuncuCentre of Digital Engineering and Manufacturing, Cranfield University, College Rd, Wharley End, Bedford, MK43 0AL UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anomaly detection in multivariate time-series data is critical for monitoring asset conditions, enabling prompt fault detection and diagnosis to mitigate damage, reduce downtime and enhance safety. Existing literature predominately emphasises temporal dependencies in single-channel data, often overlooking interrelations between features in multivariate time-series data and across multiple channels. This paper introduces G-BOCPD, a novel graphical model-based annotation method designed to automatically detect anomalies in multi-channel multivariate time-series data. To address internal and external dependencies, G-BOCPD proposes a hybridisation of the graphical lasso and expectation maximisation algorithms. This approach detects anomalies in multi-channel multivariate time-series by identifying segments with diverse behaviours and patterns, which are then annotated to highlight variations. The method alternates between estimating the concentration matrix, which represents dependencies between variables, using the graphical lasso algorithm, and annotating segments through a minimal path clustering method for a comprehensive understanding of variations. To demonstrate its effectiveness, G-BOCPD is applied to multichannel time-series obtained from: (i) Diesel Multiple Unit train engines exhibiting faulty behaviours; and (ii) a group of train doors at various degradation stages. Empirical evidence highlights G-BOCPD's superior performance compared to previous approaches in terms of precision, recall and F1-score.

Indexed as

Anomaly detectionGraphical modelMulti-channelMultivariateTime-series

Identifiers

PMID40677804
PMCPMC12263487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.