ArticleOsteoporosis and sarcopenia2025
Systematic druggable genome-wide Mendelian randomization identifies therapeutic targets for osteoporosis.
Article in Osteoporosis and sarcopenia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study was to find potential drug targets of osteoporosis (OP) through systematic druggable genome-wide Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis. Methods: Combining the multi-omics data, we utilized drug target MR and mediation MR to search for potential drug targets of OP and their possible pathways. Functional enrichment analyses were used to identify metabolic pathways of potential drug targets. In addition, we performed a two-sample MR analysis to investigate the causal relationship between immunoexpression and OP. Finally, we conducted Phe-MR analysis and drug prediction to determine the indications, potential side effects, and pharmacological activities of previously tested targets. Results: We screened three potential targets of OP-TAS1R3, TMX2, and SREBF1. Mediation MR analysis revealed that body mass index, type 2 diabetes, and chemokine C-C motif ligand 4 may be mediators for the above targets to act on OP. The Steiger Filtering test did not find a reverse causality. The results of functional enrichment analysis showed that the identified target genes may affect OP through lipid metabolism, immune expression, and insulin resistance. Two-sample MR analysis showed that HLA-DR expression in multiple monocyte subpopulations was associated with OP. The five drugs including sucrose, mirtazapine, aspartame, ginsenoside and ezetimibe are identified as the most probable candidates for the treatment of OP. Phe-MR found that TAS1R3 was associated with lower systolic blood pressure, TMX2 with neurologic and lipid metabolism, and SREBF1 with muscle power. Conclusions: Our study provides evidence support for TAS1R3, TMX2, and SREBF1 as drug targets for OP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.