Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40677775›Full record

ReviewCanadian liver journal2024

Outcomes of gynecological and breast cancer among female patients with cirrhosis: Scoping review of the literature.

Manisha Jogendran, Jennifer A Flemming

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Canadian liver journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Manisha JogendranDepartment of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Jennifer A FlemmingDepartment of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The incidence of gynecological and breast cancers is on the rise in addition to a rise in the incidence of cirrhosis among women. Women with cirrhosis are generally excluded from clinical trials therefore little is known about the oncologic and/or liver-related outcomes in this population. The aim of this study was to review the current literature regarding treatment and survival outcomes in females with gynecological or breast cancer with underlying cirrhosis. Methods: An electronic search was conducted for studies reporting outcomes among females with cirrhosis and gynecological and breast cancer. References were reviewed for relevant publications. Studies were reviewed and data were extracted from publications. Results: Three thousand one hundred ninety one articles were identified, and five studies were reviewed in full. Thirty unique patients were identified. Ten patients with breast cancer were identified, 9/10 patients did not have cancer recurrence in the follow-up period, and 1/10 did not have follow up. 1/10 patient's received chemotherapy and developed degree II abnormal liver function and bone marrow suppression. 2/9 patients experienced postoperative complications, one had worsening thrombocytopenia and one developed mild encephalopathy. Nienteen patients with ovarian cancer all received surgery and chemotherapy. 10/19 had postoperative complications and 1/19 died in follow-up period. One patient had a neuroendocrine uterine cancer stage IV who died after one cycle of chemotherapy. Conclusion: There is limited data on the outcomes and management of patients with both cirrhosis and gynecological or breast cancers. Therefore, further work is necessary to address these gaps in clinical practice to improve patient care.

Indexed as

breast cancercirrhosisgynecological cancer

Identifiers

PMID40677775
PMCPMC12269313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.