Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40677751›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2025

Revisiting

Maria Isabel Pinto Ferreira Macedo, Ximena Maria Constanza Ovando, Sthefane D'ávila

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maria Isabel Pinto Ferreira MacedoUniversidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Museu de Malacologia Prof. Maury Pinto de Oliveira, Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Ximena Maria Constanza OvandoInstitute of Biological Sciences, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Sthefane D'ávilaUniversidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Museu de Malacologia Prof. Maury Pinto de Oliveira, Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6494-309X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Terrestrial gastropods are one of the most imperiled animal groups in the world. However, information on population size and structure, geographic range and their trends over time, which is necessary to assess species conservation status, is unavailable or insufficient for most land snail taxa, making it difficult to apply the IUCN criteria. Ecological niche modelling (ENM) has been used to predict geographic distribution, allowing better characterization of the distribution ranges of endemic or rare species, offering the necessary information for stating their conservation status and planning for conservation measures. Methods: We compiled occurrence records of Results and Discussion: We have redescribed

Indexed as

EcosystemSnailsAnimal DistributionAnimalsBrazilConservation of Natural ResourcesAmazonAtlantic forestBulimulidaeCerradoConservation

Identifiers

PMID40677751
PMCPMC12269781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.