ArticlePeerJ2025
Evaluation of DNA barcoding reference databases for marine species in the western and central Pacific Ocean.
Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ethical collectomics: A guide to the responsible and fair mobilization of natural history collections.Bioscience · 2026Article
- Leakage-Safe ITS1 Identification of Fasciola hepatica and Fasciola gigantica with Reverse-Complement-Invariant CNN Inference.Acta parasitologica · 2026Article
- Evaluating Prey Availability for the Rice's Whale (Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Article
- Patagonian Fjords/Channels vs. Open Ocean: Phytoplankton Molecular Diversity on Southern Chilean Coast.Microorganisms · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
DNA barcoding is a widely used tool for species identification, with its reliability heavily dependent on reference databases. While the quality of these databases has long been debated, a critical knowledge gap remains in their comprehensive evaluation and comparison at regional scales. Marine metazoan species in the western and central Pacific Ocean (WCPO), a region characterized by high biodiversity and limited sequencing efforts, are an example of this gap. This study developed a systematic workflow to assess mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) barcode coverage and sequence quality in two commonly used reference databases for DNA barcoding: the nucleotide reference database from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI); and from the Barcode of Life Data System (BOLD). Comparative analyses across marine phyla and WCPO regions identified significant barcode gaps and quality problems, providing insights to guide future barcoding efforts. NCBI exhibited higher barcode coverage, but lower sequence quality compared to BOLD. Quality issues, including over- or under-represented species, short sequences, ambiguous nucleotides, incomplete taxonomic information, conflict records, high intraspecific distances, and low inter-specific distances were identified in both databases, likely resulting from contamination, cryptic species, sequencing errors, or inconsistent taxonomic assignment. The barcode identification number (BIN) system in BOLD demonstrated potential for identifying and addressing problematic records, highlighting the benefits of curated databases. Significant barcode deficiencies and quality issues were observed in the south temperate region of WCPO and phyla such as Porifera, Bryozoa, and Platyhelminthes. Additionally, the COI barcode showed limited species-level resolution for certain taxa, including Scombridae and Lutjanidae. Addressing barcode coverage gaps, improving taxonomic representation, and enhancing sequence quality will be essential for strengthening future barcoding initiatives and advancing biodiversity monitoring and conservation in the WCPO and beyond. This study highlights the need for standardized database curation and sequencing practices to improve the global reliability and applicability of DNA barcoding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.