Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40677654›Full record

ReviewMaedica2025

Current Knowledge of Neonatal Birth Asphyxia - a Review of Recent Literature and Novel Approach.

Ioana Luciana Badila Constantin, Vlad Dima, Corina Gabriela Zaharie

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Maedica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ioana Luciana Badila ConstantinOvidius University, Faculty of Medicine, Constanta, Romania.
Vlad DimaFilantropia Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania.
Corina Gabriela Zaharie"Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As neonatal intensive care has developed, there has been a growing focus on reducing mortality and morbidity. Hypoxic-ischemic injury remains the primary cause of neonatal brain dysfunction. Recently, notable advancements have been made in neuroprotection, particularly with the introduction of therapeutic hypothermia. Furthermore, identifying specific biomarkers has constituted another significant advance in neuroprotection, allowing clinicians to screen infants for brain injury, monitor disease progression, identify affected regions and assess the efficacy of neuroprotective trials. Erythropoietin (EPO) has demonstrated potential in the treatment of perinatal hypoxia, particularly in the reduction of neurological damage and improvement of outcomes in neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. While further research is required to ascertain the optimal usage, the existing evidence suggests that EPO could be a valuable component of a comprehensive treatment plan, potentially in conjunction with therapeutic hypothermia.

Identifiers

PMID40677654
PMCPMC12123489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.