ArticleHealth equity2025
The Importance of Recruitment of Low-Income Pregnant Persons in Interdisciplinary Research to Understand the Impact of Social and Environmental Determinants: Lessons Learned About Implementation and Recruitment.
Article in Health equity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Prior research indicates that enrolling underrepresented populations in clinical research is challenging. Although research has identified some barriers to participation and strategies to overcome them, studies have made little progress in being inclusive and representative. There remains a great need for including racial/ethnic minorities, low-income families, and pregnant women in research. The purpose of this article is to describe the implementation of enrollment strategies used in our study to understand the feasibility of building a maternal cohort and better understand the relationship between environmental and social impacts on maternal exposure and child outcomes. Methods: Working across multiple academic units, our team implemented equity-focused team science strategies to recruit diverse populations into a research study. The phases included development, conceptualization, implementation, and translation. Results: Our interdisciplinary team study used intentionality and commitment to deploy effective strategies including clearly defining the problem, selecting the correct team members to leverage expertise, clearly defining the study, establishing roles and responsibilities, representation, and clear and constant communication. A total of 100 pregnant women enrolled in our study using a team science interdisciplinary model. Discussion: Building interdisciplinary teams can help us understand complex problems, increase innovation, and develop effective solutions in policy and practice. More specifically, interdisciplinary teams can advance our ability to recruit diverse populations into research. Future studies should consider how to harness the strengths of the different research team members to achieve more inclusive participation. Health Equity Implications: This work has the potential to improve representation in research findings, enhance understanding of health disparities, and promote inclusive research practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.