ArticleLearning health systems2025
Development and implementation of a sensitivity training curriculum focused on equity in healthcare.
Article in Learning health systems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and implementation of a sensitivity training curriculum focused on equity in healthcare.Learning health systems · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: A longitudinal sensitivity-based curriculum focused on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) and consisting of interactive seminars and roundtable discussions was constructed to equip participants with tools to enhance culturally effective care and to create an inclusive learning environment. The purpose of this study was to report our single-institutional experience with the development and implementation of this evidence-based curriculum. Methods and Materials: Core DEI themes on which to center the sensitivity training curriculum were identified through an evidence-based review based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) statement. A MEDLINE search was undertaken to identify original peer-reviewed works using the items "equity, diversity, inclusion," "underserved," "disadvantaged," "sensitivity training," and "curriculum." Results: Based on the search results, a 12-month curriculum was established centered on the core themes that emerged. The 98 peer-reviewed publications chosen to develop this thematic framework could be broadly categorized as follows: health disparities ( Conclusion: The developed curriculum helped promote awareness of historical inequities in healthcare and empowered learners to become better advocates for colleagues and patients alike. The implication for healthcare leaders are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.