ArticleAoB PLANTS2025
Hybrid fertility and the rarity of homoploid hybrid speciation.
Article in AoB PLANTS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hybrid speciation is increasingly being recognized as an important driver in diversification. Of the two forms of hybrid speciation, polyploid hybrid speciation is considered more common as it provides instant reproductive isolation either completely or partially, due to meiotic incompatibilities with the parental species. Homoploid hybrid speciation is considered rare, as it lacks the instant reproductive isolation conferred by polyploidy, though there are an increasing number of examples in the literature. Reproductive isolation in the nascent homoploid hybrid species is commonly achieved by niche divergence, often into territory with one or more forms of abiotic stress unsuitable for parental species. However, reproductive isolation may be due to factors beyond mere niche divergence. In this paper, I examine the pollen fertility of hybrids compared with their parental species. Using a dataset of over 2000 observations, I compared F1 and F2 hybrids to members of the same genus and family. F1 hybrids universally have lower mean fertility than good species in their group at both the genus and family levels, and most of those differences are significant. Data for F2 hybrids are limited and conflicting, but there may be a path to restored fertility across multiple generations such as through fertility restoration genes or selection for increased fertility. Alternatively, homoploid hybrids may rely on forms of asexual reproduction. Examples exist to support both alternatives. While pollen fertility is a useful metric, other metrics of plant fertility could also throw light on the difficulty of forming a homoploid hybrid species in plants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.