Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40677582›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy2025

Endoscopic management of biliary leaks: Where are we now?

Alberto Tringali, Deborah Costa, Daryl Ramai

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Bile Leak: Is There Optimal Timing for Endoscopy?Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alberto TringaliDepartment of Digestive Endoscopy and Gastroenterology, ULSS2, Conegliano Hospital, Conegliano 31015, Italy. albtri10@gmail.com.
Deborah CostaDepartment of Digestive Endoscopy and Gastroenterology, ULSS2, Conegliano Hospital, Conegliano 31015, Italy.
Daryl RamaiDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biliary leaks can arise as a consequence of cholecystectomy, liver surgery, liver transplant, or, less frequently, trauma. Early identification and characterization of these leaks are crucial, as they can significantly enhance patient outcomes by reducing morbidity and mortality. Traditionally, surgical repair has been the standard treatment; however, advancements in endoscopic techniques and tools have established endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) as the primary approach for managing these often-complicated cases. Interventions such as sphincterotomy, nasobiliary drainage, and stent placement aim to alleviate the pressure within the bile duct, facilitating depressurization and promoting leak healing. Alongside ERCP, endoscopic ultrasound is playing an increasingly vital role in addressing challenging cases. Ongoing improvements in endoscopic technologies and methodologies offer promising prospects, often minimizing the need for invasive surgical interventions. Nonetheless, the management of biliary leaks continues to pose significant challenges for clinicians. An optimal approach for patients experiencing bile leakage should be determined on a case-by-case basis and discussed within a multidisciplinary team involving radiologists, endoscopists, and surgeons. This comprehensive review aims to elucidate the role of endoscopy in the management of various types of biliary leaks, providing clinicians with practical insights to navigate this complex field.

Indexed as

Bile duct injuryBiliary leakBiliary stentEndoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographyLiver transplantLiver traumaPost-cholecystectomySphincterotomy

Identifiers

PMID40677582
PMCPMC12264820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.