Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40677577›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy2025

Innovative schemes of colonoscopy bowel preparation with oral lactulose: Optimizing traditional standards to improve colonoscopy quality.

Josué Aliaga Ramos, Danilo Carvalho, Vitor Nunes Arantes

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Josué Aliaga RamosDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hospital José Agurto Tello-Chosica, Lima 15, Peru.
Danilo CarvalhoEndoscopy, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte 30130-100, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Vitor Nunes ArantesEndoscopy Unit, Alfa Institute of Gastroenterology, School of Medicine, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte 30130-100, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The bowel preparation is a crucial step to achieve an optimal quality in colonoscopy. The major clinical impact of an adequate colonic cleansing is to allow a more detailed and thorough inspection reducing the rates of missing lesions during the procedure and consequently reducing the incidence of interval colorectal carcinomas. Currently there are different colonoscopic preparation schemes, being the polyethylene glycol (PEG) based regimen one of the most used and recommended by the main international clinical guidelines. Nevertheless, PEG preparation requires the ingestion of considerably large volumes to achieve an optimal colonic cleansing, leading to poor tolerability in may patients, particularly in an elderly population. Other aspects that make accessibility to most colonoscopy preparation regimens difficult is their high cost and low availability. New options of colonoscopic preparation schemes based on oral lactulose are emerging with promising results, showing excellent efficacy-safety profiles and high tolerability indexes. Lactulose regimens present other benefits such as low cost and wide availability. The aim of this review is to analyze the scientific evidence to date and the current status of colonoscopy bowel preparation utilizing lactulose-based regimens, in order to consolidate this agent as a feasible "new player" in the field of colonoscopic preparation.

Indexed as

AdenomaColonoscopyColorectal neoplasmsLactulosePolyethylene glycols

Identifiers

PMID40677577
PMCPMC12264750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.