Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40677574›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy2025

Prevention and treatment of recurrence after endoscopic resection of large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps.

Samantha Pang, Pedram Tavakoli, Neal Shahidi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Large colorectal lesions: Expanding the boundaries of endoscopic management.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Samantha PangDepartment of Gastroenterology, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver V6Z2K5, Canada.
Pedram TavakoliDepartment of Gastroenterology, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver V6Z2K5, Canada.
Neal ShahidiDepartment of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver V6Z2K5, Canada. nealshahidi@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Minimally invasive endoscopic resection techniques are the recommended first-line treatment strategy for the majority of large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps, with endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) as a predominant resection modality due to its efficacy, efficiency, safety, and cost-effectiveness. A limitation of EMR is recurrence, which has historically occurred in 15%-20% of lesions. In the past 10 years, a number of effective mitigating strategies have been developed, including margin thermal ablation using snare-tip soft coagulation, argon plasma coagulation (APC), and hybrid-APC, alongside margin marking pre-resection. Moreover, techniques for effective recurrence management have also been developed. Herein, we appraise existing evidence on the frequency of recurrence, reasonings behind recurrence formation, as well as recurrence mitigating strategies and the effectiveness of recurrence management.

Indexed as

AdenomaCancerColonoscopyEndoscopyPolyp

Identifiers

PMID40677574
PMCPMC12264792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.