ArticleFood chemistry: X2025
Investigating the influence of
Article in Food chemistry: X, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analysis of nutritional components and flavor compounds in naturally fermented, fermentation agent-fermented, and unfermented multi-grain pancakes.Food chemistry: X · 2026Article
- Influence ofMetabolites · 2026Article
- Cultivar-dependent interplay between volatile biosynthesis and texture deterioration in pear during cold storage and shelf-life.Food chemistry: X · 2026Article
- Flavor characteristics of rice-aroma baijiu under low, atmospheric, and high pressure distillation: a comparative study.Food chemistry: X · 2026Article
- Research on High-Efficiency and No-Additive Physical Aging Equipment and Process of Baijiu Production Based on High-Speed Jet Catalysis.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Quality evaluation ofFrontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To evaluate the feasibility of 60Co irradiation for rapid aging of SSATB, this study employed fresh SSATB (CK) as a benchmark while subjecting test samples to irradiation for 12 h, 24 h, 36 h, and 48 h, natural aging for five years (5Y) as a contrast. Three analytical platforms,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.