Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40677516›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Perceptions, barriers, and risk of artificial intelligence Among healthcare professionals: A cross-sectional study.

Alaa Dalky, Rand Mohammad Osaid Malkawi, Ahmad Alrawashdeh, Mohammed ALBashtawy, Salam Bani Hani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alaa DalkyDepartment of Health Management and Policy, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.
Rand Mohammad Osaid MalkawiDepartment of Health Management and Policy, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.
Ahmad AlrawashdehDepartment of Allied Medical Sciences, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.
Mohammed ALBashtawyDepartment of Community and Mental Health Nursing, Princess Salma Faculty of Nursing, Al al Bayt University, Mafraq, Jordan.
Salam Bani HaniNursing Department, Irbid National University, Irbid, Jordan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0848-5615

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study found that healthcare professionals expressed diverse opinions regarding the integration of AI in the Jordanian healthcare sector. This study aimed to explore healthcare professionals' perceptions of artificial intelligence (AI) and how these perceptions relate to perceived barriers and potential risks associated with AI integration in clinical practice in Jordan. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional survey of 605 healthcare professionals who were conveniently selected from four types of hospitals, namely private, teaching-affiliated, Royal Medical Service, and public in Amman city and the northern regions of Jordan. Results: About half of the respondents were female (50.7%), holding a bachelor's degree (60.5%) and having 1-5 years of experience (33.1%), working in the Ministry of Health (47.4%). This study found that healthcare professionals hold optimistic perceptions of AI integration in the Jordanian healthcare sector. There is a moderate level of perceived barriers and a perceived level of risks associated with AI incorporation into the healthcare sector. Conclusion: This study highlights the need for more transparent policies, better communication, and more robust frameworks for AI implementation in healthcare.

Indexed as

AIbarriershealthcare professionalJordanperceptionsrisks

Identifiers

PMID40677516
PMCPMC12268143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.