Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40677503›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Effectiveness of Amniotic Membrane Transplantation in Corneal Ulcer Healing: A Systematic Review.

Anas E Ahmed, Eyad M Albarrati, Abdulaziz Y Muyidi, Yara M Adawi, Hani A Al-Ghamdi, Ahmed A Alahmadi, Abdulrahman F Alshehri, Faisal H Alfaify, Sultan M Almugharrid, Ali S Alkebiri and 5 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Anas E AhmedCommunity Medicine, Jazan University, Jazan, SAU.
Eyad M AlbarratiCollege of Medicine, Jazan University, Jazan, SAU.
Abdulaziz Y MuyidiCollege of Medicine, Jazan University, Jazan, SAU.
Yara M AdawiCollege of Medicine, Jazan University, Jazan, SAU.
Hani A Al-GhamdiCollege of Medicine, Al-Baha University, Al-Baha, SAU.
Ahmed A AlahmadiCollege of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Mecca, SAU.
Abdulrahman F AlshehriMedicine and Surgery, Umm Al-Qura University, Mecca, SAU.
Faisal H AlfaifyCollege of Medicine, Jazan University, Jazan, SAU.
Sultan M AlmugharridCollege of Medicine, University of Bisha, Bisha, SAU.
Ali S AlkebiriCollege of Medicine, University of Bisha, Bisha, SAU.
Abdulmajeed A AlghamdiCollege of Medicine, University of Bisha, Bisha, SAU.
Faisal A AlsalouliCollege of Medicine, University of Bisha, Bisha, SAU.
Hussam A AlmalkiMedicine and Surgery, Umm Al-Qura University, Mecca, SAU.
Abdullah M AlsharifCollege of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Mecca, SAU.
Rayan S AlmugharridCollege of Medicine, King Khalid University, Abha, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Corneal ulcers are a major cause of visual morbidity and blindness worldwide, and conventional treatments often fall short, particularly in chronic or neurotrophic cases. Amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT) has emerged as a promising adjunctive therapy due to its regenerative, anti-inflammatory, and anti-scarring properties. This systematic review evaluated the effectiveness of AMT in promoting corneal ulcer healing by assessing epithelialization time, visual acuity improvement, and complications. A comprehensive search of five databases - PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Virtual Health Library - was conducted up to April 20, 2024, including randomized controlled trials and prospective clinical studies published in English over the past decade. Nine studies were included, involving diverse patient populations and ulcer etiologies. AMT consistently accelerated epithelial healing, with reduced healing times compared to controls, early postoperative pain relief, and visual acuity improvements, particularly in central ulcers. Adverse effects were infrequent, and graft failure was rare. However, differences in technique and outcome measures limited comparability across studies. Overall, AMT appears to be a safe and effective adjunctive treatment for corneal ulcers, enhancing healing, comfort, and vision. Further validation through standardized protocols and high-quality multicenter trials is recommended to support clinical implementation.

Indexed as

amniotic membrane transplantationcorneal ulcerepithelial healingeye inflammationgraft failureneurotrophic keratitisocular surfaceregenerative therapysystematic reviewvisual acuity

Identifiers

PMID40677503
PMCPMC12270348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.