ReviewCureus2025
Effectiveness of Amniotic Membrane Transplantation in Corneal Ulcer Healing: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Infectious bacterial keratitis management in a Swedish region: Risk factors, treatment and time-to-resolution.Acta ophthalmologica · 2026Article
- SPARC Promotes Corneal Epithelial Wound Healing Through β-catenin Nuclear Translocation and c-Met Activation.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- Results of adjunctive homogenate amniotic membrane eye drops in the management of refractory ocular surface disease with dry eye manifestations.International ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Amniotic membrane transplantation combined with cryotherapy vs. lamellar keratoplasty for medically refractory peripheral ulcerative keratitis: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Methamphetamine-Associated Corneal Ulcer: Case Report.Reports (MDPI) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Corneal ulcers are a major cause of visual morbidity and blindness worldwide, and conventional treatments often fall short, particularly in chronic or neurotrophic cases. Amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT) has emerged as a promising adjunctive therapy due to its regenerative, anti-inflammatory, and anti-scarring properties. This systematic review evaluated the effectiveness of AMT in promoting corneal ulcer healing by assessing epithelialization time, visual acuity improvement, and complications. A comprehensive search of five databases - PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Virtual Health Library - was conducted up to April 20, 2024, including randomized controlled trials and prospective clinical studies published in English over the past decade. Nine studies were included, involving diverse patient populations and ulcer etiologies. AMT consistently accelerated epithelial healing, with reduced healing times compared to controls, early postoperative pain relief, and visual acuity improvements, particularly in central ulcers. Adverse effects were infrequent, and graft failure was rare. However, differences in technique and outcome measures limited comparability across studies. Overall, AMT appears to be a safe and effective adjunctive treatment for corneal ulcers, enhancing healing, comfort, and vision. Further validation through standardized protocols and high-quality multicenter trials is recommended to support clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.