ArticleCureus2025
The Role of Ultrasound in Postoperative Assessment of Biceps Tenodesis: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Superior labral anterior-posterior (SLAP) tears frequently occur following overhead activities or traumatic shoulder injuries. While magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) remains the gold standard for diagnosis, ultrasound shows promise for postoperative monitoring of long head biceps tendon (LHBT) tenodesis. We present the case of a 55-year-old man with a type III SLAP tear who developed a screw cut-out after subpectoral tenodesis. Initial conservative management was unsuccessful, necessitating surgical intervention. At one-year follow-up, ultrasound evaluation demonstrated an empty bicipital groove, preserved tendon architecture, and stable subpectoral fixation, findings later confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The ultrasound findings were largely concordant with the MRI findings while offering the advantages of real-time dynamic assessment, cost-effectiveness, and immediate bedside availability. This case demonstrates the reliability of ultrasound for postoperative monitoring of biceps tenodesis. The modality enables early detection of complications without radiation exposure, though operator experience remains important for optimal results. While MRI retains superiority for preoperative diagnosis, ultrasound serves as an effective screening and follow-up tool with the unique capability to assess tendon motion dynamically. However, its accuracy is operator-dependent, and variability in interpretation between clinicians can affect diagnostic consistency, factors that are particularly important to consider in this context. The findings of this case support the growing role of ultrasound in sports medicine practice, bridging the gap between clinical examination and advanced imaging. Further standardization of ultrasound protocols could significantly improve postoperative shoulder assessment. The case highlights how ultrasound can optimize patient care pathways while maintaining diagnostic accuracy for biceps tenodesis monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.