ArticleCureus2025
Occupational Health Physicians' Perspectives on Factors Influencing Return-to-Work Decisions for Employees With Mental Health Disorders: A Retrospective Observational Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Assessing fitness for work among employees with mental health disorders presents significant challenges. While it is fundamentally assumed that employees must be capable of adequately fulfilling their job responsibilities, occupational health professionals frequently encounter difficulties in making such determinations. This study aims to elucidate the factors considered by occupational physicians, particularly those specializing in psychiatry when evaluating the work eligibility of employees experiencing mental health issues. Methods We analyzed a subset of occupational physician interview records collected over a 14.5-year period at a higher education institution. A total of 1,381 interviews involving 184 individuals were included. For two groups, employees currently working and those on leave, we used the occupational physician's decision as the dependent variable. A generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) was employed to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) of factors associated with the physician's decision to recommend sick leave versus continued work without leave. Results Among employees currently working, factors associated with the occupational physician's decision to recommend sick leave rather than continued work included other occupations (OR [95% CI] = 5.43 [1.16, 25.42]), reduced sense of sleep quality (OR [95% CI] = 4.22 [1.07, 16.67]), and loss of appetite (OR [95% CI] = 6.81 [1.36, 34.2]). Among employees on sick leave, the only factor associated with a return-to-work decision, as opposed to continued sick leave, was the total duration of prior sick leave (in months) (OR [95% CI] = 0.94 [0.91, 0.96]). Conclusions The present study revealed that occupational physicians specializing in psychiatry place significant emphasis on lifestyle factors such as sleep and appetite when assessing fitness for work. When occupational physicians assessed fitness to return to work for employees on sick leave, they focused on the duration of the leave, which could serve as a potential risk factor for relapse.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.