ArticleCureus2025
Accessory Brachial Artery Causing Delayed Vasospasm After Angiography: A Detailed Analysis of a Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cerebral angiography remains the gold standard investigation for cerebrovascular disease. Transradial access is increasingly preferred over the transfemoral approach because it facilitates early ambulation and reduces complications at the access site. We report a woman in her 70s who developed delayed peripheral circulatory failure in the digital arteries following transradial cerebral angiography. After inserting a 4-French sheath into the conventional right radial artery, the catheter was advanced toward the subclavian artery but inadvertently entered a small accessory brachial artery with significant resistance, provoking severe vasospasm. The procedure was completed without incident after redirecting the catheter into the main brachial artery. Symptoms gradually appeared 24 hours after the procedure, and after 48 hours, the patient experienced burning pain, weakness, and pallor in her right hand. Angiography via the brachial artery demonstrated diffuse spasm of the radial artery, palmar arch, and digital arteries. Intra-arterial nitroglycerin quickly restored flow and alleviated symptoms. This case illustrates that inadvertent cannulation of an accessory brachial artery during transradial access can lead to delayed digital circulatory failure and that early intra-arterial vasodilator therapy is effective. Careful observation is necessary if such a catheter deviates into a small vessel with an anatomical anomaly, and spasm occurs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.