Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40677418›Full record

ReviewChinese medical journal pulmonary and critical care medicine2025

Achieving remission in severe asthma.

Sarita Thawanaphong, Santi Nolasco, Parameswaran Nair

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chinese medical journal pulmonary and critical care medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Asthma endotypes and theratypes.Chinese medical journal pulmonary and critical care medicine · 2026
    Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sarita ThawanaphongDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada.
Santi NolascoDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada.
Parameswaran NairDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Severe asthma affects 5-10 % of asthma patients worldwide, imposing a significant burden due to an increased risk of mortality, impaired quality of life, and substantial economic costs. Recent advancements in biologic therapies have transformed asthma management by targeting specific inflammatory pathways, particularly type 2 inflammation. Biologic treatments such as omalizumab, mepolizumab, reslizumab, benralizumab, and dupilumab have demonstrated efficacy in reducing exacerbations, improving lung function, and achieving clinical remission in a subset of patients. This review provides an overview of the mechanisms of action, indications, and treatment efficacy of biologics used in asthma management. We also explore the concept of asthma remission and the potential for achieving it through biologic therapies and complementary strategies, including optimized inhaler use, macrolides, and bronchial thermoplasty. In addition, we discuss how to choose among these treatments wisely and examine the limitations of each biologic therapy. Despite these advancements, clinical remission rates remain modest, underscoring the need for refined patient selection. Emerging tools such as airway biomarkers, proteomics, and advanced imaging techniques offer promising avenues to improve diagnosis and personalize treatment approaches. Future research focused on making advanced biomarkers more accessible and feasible for point-of-care testing will enhance treatment precision. The next step will be integrating a multiomics approach into personalized asthma management for severe disease, further improving asthma control, achieving sustained remission, and ultimately reducing the burden of severe asthma.

Indexed as

BiologicsRemissionSevere asthma

Identifiers

PMID40677418
PMCPMC12266276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.