ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2025
Epidemiology of Open Globe Injury in Children at a Tertiary Hospital in Jordan.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Sex-based differences in ocular trauma: a systematic review with narrative synthesis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To study the epidemiology of open globe injury (OGI) in children and highlight the risk factors associated with these injuries and suggest targeted protocols and strategies to minimise its occurrence. Methods: A retrospective analysis of all paediatric OGI cases presenting to our unit between Jan 2014 and Jan 2018. Clinical records were reviewed, and demographic data was collected and analysed for age, gender, place of occurrence, mechanism of injury, type of trauma, and direct cause of injury. Clinical data including presenting visual acuity, type of injury, number of operations, complications, and final visual acuity were also recorded. Results: A total of 67 cases were identified, but 8 cases were excluded due to lack of complete data. Fifty-nine eyes of 59 patients were included, of whom 31 (53%) involved the left eye and 46 patients were males (78%). The mean presenting vision was 1.7 ± 1.05 Log MAR (Median 1.8; IQR 2.2), and the mean vision at 12 months was 0.8 ± 1.13 Log MAR (Median 0.3; IQR 0.7) with the difference being statistically significant (P < 0.001). Mean age was 9.34 ± 4.35 (range 3-16) years and, in most cases (78%), the mechanism of injury was due to a sharp object. The most common places where injuries occurred were home settings (42%) and neighbourhood areas (36%), whereas schools were not found to be common places for injury. Conclusion: We identified epidemiological features of OGI in children in our community that may help local authorities and health education teams reduce its incidence. Discouraging the use of sharp objects by young children, especially in home settings, requires more public awareness strategies. Community and healthcare services may consider these findings useful for implementing local strategies and protocols to prevent and reduce the occurrence of such devastating injuries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.