Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40677359›Full record

ArticleKidney international reports2025

Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial of Desmopressin for Post-Kidney Biopsy Bleeding.

Narayan Prasad, Jeyakumar Meyyappan, Deependra Kumar Yadav, Brijesh Yadav, Ravi Kushwaha, Manas Patel, Vamsidhar Veeranki, Dharmendra Bhadauria, Manas Behera, Monika Yachha and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Kidney international reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Narayan PrasadDepartment of Nephrology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Jeyakumar MeyyappanDepartment of Nephrology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Deependra Kumar YadavDepartment of Nephrology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Brijesh YadavDepartment of Nephrology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Ravi KushwahaDepartment of Nephrology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Manas PatelDepartment of Nephrology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Vamsidhar VeerankiDepartment of Nephrology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Dharmendra BhadauriaDepartment of Nephrology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Manas BeheraDepartment of Nephrology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Monika YachhaDepartment of Nephrology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Anupama KaulDepartment of Nephrology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Jai KishunDepartment of Biostatistics, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Dheeraj KhetanDepartment of Transfusion Medicine, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Anupam VermaDepartment of Transfusion Medicine, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Heera LalDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of desmopressin in reducing postbiopsy bleeding in patients undergoing kidney biopsy, a common complication requiring effective prevention strategies. Methods: In this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial conducted from February 2019 to January 2023 at a teaching institute in Lucknow, India, 203 patients aged 18 to 65 years undergoing indication kidney biopsy were randomized to receive desmopressin (300 μg) or placebo intranasally an hour before the procedure. Outcomes included postbiopsy bleeding (primary) and hemoglobin drop, hypotension, hematuria, hematoma, transfusion need, and radiological or surgical interventions (secondary). Results: Bleeding incidence was significantly lower in the desmopressin group (11.9%) compared with placebo (33.3%, Conclusion: Desmopressin effectively reduces postbiopsy bleeding and hematoma formation with manageable side effects, supporting its role as a prophylactic option in kidney biopsies. Further studies are needed to confirm its broader clinical applications.

Indexed as

desmopressinfactor VIIIkidney biopsyplacebopostbiopsy bleedingrandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID40677359
PMCPMC12266218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.