ArticleKidney international reports2025
Systematic Review of the Outcomes and Prognostic Factors of Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus-Associated Thrombotic Microangiopathy.
Article in Kidney international reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Kidney Biopsy and Prognosis in Lupus Nephritis: Histological Predictors of Renal Outcome-A Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Analysis of causes and outcomes of principal secondary thrombotic microangiopathy: a 9-year cohort study from a tertiary pediatric center in China.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026Article
- Multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor-associated renal thrombotic microangiopathy: a pooled analysis of 31 cases.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Update in the diagnosis of complement-mediated thrombotic microangiopathy/atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) is a rare but severe complication of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE); however, the overall patient and renal survival rates of patients with SLE-associated TMA (SLE-TMA) remain controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the prognosis of and identify potential prognostic factors in patients with SLE-TMA. Methods: Literature search was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trial, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, CNKI, and Sinomed for studies published before December 2023. Studies that encompassed no less than 5 patients with SLE-TMA and followed well-recognized diagnostic criteria were included, whereas studies with a median follow-up < 6 months or that provided incomplete outcomes were excluded. Results: Fourteen eligible studies encompassing a total of 446 patients with SLE-TMA were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled 1-, 3-, and 5-year patient survival rates were 83% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.65-0.96), 81% (95% CI: 0.59-0.96), and 77% (95% CI: 0.52-0.95), respectively. The pooled 1-, 3-, and 5-year renal survival rates were 85% (95% CI: 0.81-0.89), 75% (95% CI: 0.63-0.85), and 56% (95% CI: 0.31-0.79). The pooled 1-, 3-, and 5-year renal relative risks in patients with SLE-TMA compared with patients with SLE without TMA were 4.01 (95% CI: 2.10-7.65), 2.53 (95% CI: 1.83-3.51), and 2.58 (95% CI: 2.01-3.29). Univariate Cox regression indicated that high baseline serum creatinine (SCr) levels, high renal chronicity index and acute hemodialysis were independent prognostic factors of renal survival. Conclusion: Patients with SLE-TMA exhibit lower long-term patient and renal survival rates. High baseline SCr levels, high renal chronicity index or a need for acute hemodialysis at baseline are associated with poorer renal outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.