Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40677297›Full record

ArticleIntegrative medicine research2025

Evaluating efficacy and safety of auricular acupressure in treating allergic rhinitis: A randomized controlled trial.

Ngoc-Chau Le, Minh-Man Pham Bui, Dieu-Thuong Thi Trinh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Integrative medicine research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ngoc-Chau LeUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Minh-Man Pham BuiUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Dieu-Thuong Thi TrinhTraditional Medicine Administration, Ministry of Health, Hanoi, Vietnam.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Allergic rhinitis significantly impacts health and quality of life, and symptom management remains a considerable challenge. This study aims to compare the treatment efficacy of auricular acupressure combined with fluticasone propionate versus fluticasone propionate alone for allergic rhinitis. Methods: A randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial study was conducted with 90 patients diagnosed with allergic rhinitis according to ARIA 2008 guidelines. The control group ( Results: After four weeks, the reduction in VAS scores for individual symptoms, including sneezing, runny nose, blocked nose, and itchy nose, showed mean differences between the control and intervention groups of 17.71 (95 % CI, 10.60-24.82); 22.73 (95 % CI, 15.71-29.76); 22.33 (95 % CI, 15.30-29.37); and 21.29 (95 % CI, 14.27-28.31) points, respectively ( Conclusions: Auricular acupressure combined with fluticasone propionate provides effective and safe treatment for allergic rhinitis patients. Further interventional studies based on the classification of clinical syndromes in traditional medicine are warranted.

Indexed as

Allergic rhinitisAuricular acupressureFluticasone propionate

Identifiers

PMID40677297
PMCPMC12269383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.