ArticleData in brief2025
A robust dataset for surgical instrument detection to aid autonomous robotic surgery.
Article in Data in brief, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- DriveNet: A comprehensive dataset for driver posture recognition to enhance ergonomics and safety.Data in brief · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Robot-assisted surgery (RAS) is transforming modern healthcare by enhancing precision, reducing human error, and improving patient outcomes. A crucial step toward fully autonomous robotic surgery is the accurate and real-time recognition of surgical instruments. In this work, we present a comprehensive surgical instrument dataset named as SID-RAS which comprises of 6000 high resolution images categorized into nine distinct classes: cotton, episiotomy scissors, forceps, gloves, hemostats, mayo, scalpel, stitch scissors, and syringe. To ensure dataset's diversity and simulate real world surgical scenarios, multiple augmentations were applied, including motion blur, varying lighting conditions (low light and high brightness), simulated blood stains, and 360-degree rotation. The dataset was evaluated using YOLOv10 (nano, small, medium) and YOLOv11 (nano, small, medium) object detection models, aiming to assess their effectiveness in recognizing and localizing surgical instruments in real-time. On an average, the models have attained 99.3% of mean Average Precision (mAP) and 99.2% F1-score, demonstrating the quality of SID-RAS dataset for surgical tool detection. These findings contribute to the preliminary development of AI-driven robotic surgical assistance systems, which can be extended to various types of surgeries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.