ReviewComputational and structural biotechnology journal2025
Wheels turning: CHO cell modeling moves into a digital biomanufacturing era: Subtitle: CHO Metabolic Modeling.
Review in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improving recombinant protein productivity in CHO cells via multi-omics data integration.Bioresources and bioprocessing · 2026Review
- Systematic data-driven genome-scale metabolic model reduction for bioprocess modeling: CHO culture case study.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2026Article
- A Hybrid Modeling Framework for Predictive Digital Twins of CHO Cell Culture.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- Comprehensive Lipidomic Analysis of Recombinant Protein-Producing CHO Cell Cultures: Insights for Media and Process Development.Mass spectrometry (Tokyo, Japan) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent advancements in biologics production using CHO cells have been partly driven by improved understanding of how variations in the cell culture environment influence cellular metabolism, productivity, and the attributes of the final product. In-silico models serve a valuable role in mapping the effects of various process parameters and media changes on cellular response. Advances in technologies such as data-driven analysis, self-learning systems, and digital twins are reinforcing progress toward smart manufacturing, enabling the real-time control of production processes. Furthermore, kinetic, and constraint-based mechanistic modeling, combined with omics approaches, are becoming increasingly incorporated into the bioprocess development and manufacturing innovation ecosystem. In this review, we cover CHO central metabolism as a foundation for mechanistic modeling and extend the discussion to include various mechanistic modeling approaches, highlighting the incorporation of glycosylation and secretory pathways. Multi-omics approaches provide a deeper understanding of intracellular processes and the dynamic interactions between product quality and pathways. In parallel, to achieve the Industry 4.0 vision of digitalization and machine learning techniques are finding wider adoption in biopharmaceutical development. We discuss the potential applications of these techniques for predictions, inference, optimization, and control. The role of big data analytics and artificial intelligence methods in reinforcing progress towards smart manufacturing and enabling real-time control of production processes is discussed. Finally, we summarize the application of machine learning and hybrid models to CHO bioprocesses, aiming to develop and manufacture drugs more efficiently and at a lower cost for patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.