Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40677214›Full record

ArticlePsychophysiology2025

Withstand Context: Standing Posture Improves Contextual Cueing in Challenging Visual Search.

Artyom Zinchenko, Nuno Busch, Gordon Dodwell, Thomas Geyer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Artyom ZinchenkoDepartment of Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2728-0981
Nuno BuschDepartment of Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0009-0003-0032-1189
Gordon DodwellSchool of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck, University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6772-9849
Thomas GeyerDepartment of Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8178-4086

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft GE1889/4-1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft GE1889/4-2Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft GE1889/7-2Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft ZI1950/2-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans can learn to use repeated spatial arrangements of irrelevant, non-target items to direct the focus of attention towards behaviorally relevant-target-items, a phenomenon known as contextual cueing (CC). However, whether CC is itself dependent on attentional resources is a controversial issue. Here, we used visual search to test how CC is affected when attention varies through two types of manipulations: perceptual load (as induced by target-distractor similarity) and postural load (sitting vs. standing). For easy searches (low target-distractor similarity), we observed reliable facilitation of search in repeated-context displays, which was independent of participants' body posture. For difficult searches (high target-distractor similarity), contextual facilitation was evident only with standing posture. Posture-related benefits remained significant even after controlling for heart rate variability (HRV), body mass index, and physical activity. Decomposing aggregated reaction times by drift-diffusion modeling revealed that CC in difficult searches decreased the amount of evidence required for target-response decisions. Our results suggest that statistical learning is effectively supplemented during standing posture when visual search is challenging, possibly because posture manipulation and contextual manipulation affect common response-selection stages of processing.

Indexed as

AttentionCuesPosturePsychomotor PerformanceStanding PositionVisual PerceptionAdultFemaleHumansMaleReaction TimeYoung Adultbody posturecontextual cueingdivided attentionexecutive functionsHRVload theoryselective attentionsit‐standstatistical learningworking memory

Identifiers

PMID40677214
PMCPMC12272028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.