Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40677149›Full record

ArticleActa anaesthesiologica Scandinavica2025

Anesthesia and Analgesia Methods in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty and Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty-A Survey of Nordic Anesthesiologists.

Maarit Rantakokko, Marcus Teräs, Pekka Tarkkila, Andreas Wiklund, Martin Ingi Sigurðsson, Gjermund Galleberg, Sine Wichmann, Panu Uusalo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Maarit RantakokkoDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Marcus TeräsDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID 0009-0006-8221-3035
Pekka TarkkilaDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-8941-6368
Andreas WiklundCapio Artro Clinic, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0009-0000-3765-3003
Martin Ingi SigurðssonDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Landspitali - The National University Hospital of Iceland, Reykjavik Iceland, and Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Gjermund GallebergDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Sine WichmannDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital - North Zealand, Hillerod, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-0360-8655
Panu UusaloDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-5120-8854

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe objective of this survey was to assess the current practices of analgesia and anesthesia for patients undergoing primary hip (THA) and knee (TKA) total joint arthroplasty in the Nordic countries. Additionally, we aimed to explore the differences in anesthesia and analgesia techniques, prevalence of day case surgery procedures, criteria for patient selection, and the challenges associated with patient discharge.

methodsAn online survey was created and distributed to all anesthesiologists of Nordic orthopedic surgical units conducting over 100 arthroplasties a year according to national arthroplasty registries.

resultsOut of 298 survey responses, 94.3% reported following a standard operation procedure (SOP). Preoperative medication was used by 65.1% for THA and 63.1% for TKA patients. Intraoperative corticosteroids were administered by 79.2% for THA and 81.7% for TKA patients. Spinal anesthesia was used for THA (95.6%) and TKA (92.3%), with bupivacaine preferred for spinal anesthesia in THA (83.9%) and TKA (88.4%). Local infiltration analgesia (LIA) was used for 37.6% of THA and 64.4% of TKA patients. Peripheral nerve blocks were administered by 8.1% for THA and 40.9% for TKA patients. Postoperative pain medications included opioids (96.0%), paracetamol (93.0%), NSAIDs including COX-2 inhibitors (81.9%), and gabapentinoids (8.4%). Antiemetics were used by 43.7%. Nearly half of respondents (49.7%) from 61 hospitals reported performing primary THA and TKA as day-case procedures, but less than 25% of patients had day surgery. Delayed discharge reasons included intense pain, motor weakness, and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV).

conclusionsThere is general agreement in the Nordic countries on preoperative medication, anesthesia techniques, and multimodal pain management, though variability exists in the use of peripheral nerve blocks and LIA. Day-case TJAs are common, especially in Denmark. Pain, motor weakness, and PONV are the main barriers to same-day discharge. The survey suggests that better management of PONV with consistent use of antiemetics could improve recovery and reduce discharge delays. This report describes survey results about anesthesia management preferences for anesthesia management for adult hip and knee arthroplasty cases in Nordic countries. The findings demonstrate practice focus on early recovery where possible.

Indexed as

AnalgesiaAnesthesiaArthroplasty, Replacement, HipArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeAnesthesia, SpinalAnesthesiologistsFemaleHumansMalePostoperative PainScandinavian and Nordic CountriesSurveys and Questionnairesday case surgerymultimodal anesthesiatotal hip arthroplastytotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID40677149
PMCPMC12271837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.