Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40677119›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation2025

The Use of Cisatracurium in Cardiac Surgery.

Vikas C Roy, Sakshi Mehta, Rajni Bala

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Vikas C RoyGlobal College of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacy, Kahanpur, Punjab, India.ORCID 0009-0009-1683-8039
Sakshi MehtaAdduct Healthcare Pvt. Ltd., Kharar, Punjab.ORCID 0009-0007-0199-7630
Rajni BalaAdduct Healthcare Pvt. Ltd., Kharar, Punjab.ORCID 0000-0002-6180-2424

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The introduction of neuromuscular blockers (NMBs) has revolutionized the practice of general anaesthesia, ushering in a new era where anaesthesia is conceptualized as a triad comprising narcosis, analgesia, and muscle relaxation. NMBs play a vital role in surgeries by facilitating tracheal intubation, preventing the movement of body and diaphragm, control of ventilation at normal partial pressure of carbon dioxide and counteraction of narcotic-induced truncal rigidity. However, the absence of specific guidelines for the selection and utilization of particular NMBs in various surgical contexts has led to inconsistencies within the healthcare system. Thus, a deep and thorough understanding of pharmacological aspects of NMBs is required for the selection and usage of particular NMB in clinical setting. Ideal NMBs are characterized by rapid onset, non-cumulative effects, independence from renal or hepatic function for elimination, rapid reversibility, and minimal adverse side effects. Among several NMBs, cisatracurium, an isomer of atracurium is a non-depolarizing intermediate-acting with characteristic features of high potency, smaller dosage requirement, no histamine release, no cardiovascular effects and elimination via organ-independent Hofmann reaction. Innumerable clinical experiments and trials suggest cisatracurium as safe, cost-effective, and better molecule with predictable recovery and no postoperative residual paralysis in comparison to other NMBs such as rocuronium, vecuronium, and pancuronium. In this review, we aimed to provide critical insights on the properties of NMBs first and then focused on the use of cisatracurium in cardiac surgeries.

Indexed as

Cardiac surgerycisatracuriuminductionneuromuscular blockersresidual paralysis

Identifiers

PMID40677119
PMCPMC12728455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.