Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40677117›Full record

ReviewSmall (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)2025

Understanding Interphases and Interfaces of Battery Materials at the Nanoscale.

Sergio Federico Mayer, Benjamin Mercier-Guyon, Célia Doublet, Adrien Fauchier-Magnan, Léa Rose Mangani, Corentin Renais, Magda Reuter, Oskar Thompson, Lucas Trassart, Claire Villevieille

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Probing Buried Interfaces in Batteries: TowardChemistry of materials : a publication of the American Chemical Society · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sergio Federico MayerUniv. Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, Grenoble INP, LEPMI, Grenoble, 38000, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3101-4734
Benjamin Mercier-GuyonUniv. Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, Grenoble INP, LEPMI, Grenoble, 38000, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8259-1400
Célia DoubletUniv. Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, Grenoble INP, LEPMI, Grenoble, 38000, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2646-6849
Adrien Fauchier-MagnanUniv. Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, Grenoble INP, LEPMI, Grenoble, 38000, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7114-9240
Léa Rose ManganiUniv. Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, Grenoble INP, LEPMI, Grenoble, 38000, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2608-8229
Corentin RenaisUniv. Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, Grenoble INP, LEPMI, Grenoble, 38000, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7354-4040
Magda ReuterUniv. Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, Grenoble INP, LEPMI, Grenoble, 38000, France.
Oskar ThompsonUniv. Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, Grenoble INP, LEPMI, Grenoble, 38000, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7281-6531
Lucas TrassartUniv. Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, Grenoble INP, LEPMI, Grenoble, 38000, France.
Claire VillevieilleUniv. Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, Grenoble INP, LEPMI, Grenoble, 38000, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8782-4800

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-21-CE50-0044Carnot Energie du Futur SONARégion Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes Pack Ambition Recherche - Isobatt
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Battery performance and longevity are critically dependent on interfacial characteristics, regardless of whether these interfaces are organic, inorganic, or buried. Comprehensive understanding of these regions is essential for optimizing electrochemical performance. Characterization of battery interfaces presents significant challenges due to their nanometer-scale thickness, complex composition (often a mixture of organic and inorganic decomposition products), and susceptibility to environmental factors and beam damage. In situ and operando techniques, often utilizing synchrotron or neutron sources, are preferred to minimize contamination and capture dynamic interfacial evolution. However, experimental constraints limit universal applicability; vacuum-based methods suitable for solid-state batteries are incompatible with liquid electrolyte systems, while buried interfaces pose unique analytical hurdles. A lack of standardized characterization protocols contributes to data variability and potential bias within literature. This review addresses strategies for investigating buried interfaces and examines advanced characterization techniques commonly employed in lithium-ion battery interface studies. This study specifically addresses concerns surrounding data interpretation and the inherent sensitivity of these layers, highlighting the need for careful methodological consideration and rigorous data validation to ensure accurate representation of interfacial behavior.

Indexed as

beam damageburied interfacecathode‐electrolyte interphaseinterphaselithium‐ion batteriesnative layersolid‐electrolyte interphase

Identifiers

PMID40677117
PMCPMC12393027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.