ArticleTechnology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine2025
Hemodynamics and restenosis risk assessment in Budd-Chiari syndrome: A CFD study.
Article in Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It carries an expression of concern. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Expression of concern
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and ObjectiveBudd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) presents challenges in postoperative restenosis risk prediction due to unclear hemodynamic pathophysiology. Despite advances in interventional therapies, tools linking hemodynamic abnormalities to vascular remodeling are lacking. This study aimed to evaluate hemodynamic changes in BCS patients with inferior vena cava (IVC) stenosis using patient-specific MRI and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to establish predictive biomarkers and optimize management.Methods3D IVC models were reconstructed from preoperative, postoperative, and healthy control MRI data. Dynamic hemodynamic parameters, including flow velocity, pressure gradients, wall shear stress (WSS), and vortex patterns, were analyzed via CFD simulations under physiologically accurate boundary conditions.ResultsPreoperative IVC stenosis caused severe disturbances. Post-intervention, parameters decreased (e.g., peak stenotic velocity from 1.91 m/s to 0.97 m/s; trans-stenotic pressure gradient from 3562 Pa to 1404 Pa) but remained higher than normal (peak velocity: 0.27 m/s; pressure fluctuation: Δ1225 Pa). Persistent vortices near stent edges and incomplete pressure normalization were observed, correlating with restenosis incidence. These findings highlight unresolved WSS (post-op peak WSS: 18.2 Pa vs normal: 6.18 Pa) and abnormal flow dynamics (e.g., prolonged vortex duration) as key recurrence risks.ConclusionThis study provides a hemodynamic framework for BCS, showing that intervention alleviates stenosis but doesn't restore normal flow. Residual stress emphasizes the need for adjunct therapies. The CFD approach offers predictive insights, advocating personalized monitoring for improved BCS outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40676932What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.