ArticleAmerican journal of botany2025
Biosilicification in monocots: Comparative analysis highlights contrasting patterns of deposition.
Article in American journal of botany, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Elucidating the mechanistic link: how silicon enhances lodging resistance in oat via targeted regulation of lignin biosynthesis in the second stem internode.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Extreme triple oxygen isotope fractionation inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Biosilicification in monocots: Comparative analysis highlights contrasting patterns of deposition.American journal of botany · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
premiseNew insights into biomineral uptake and sequestration are important for understanding how plants grow. Some plants accumulate silica accretions in precise locations in particular cells. Among monocots, controlled biosilicification occurs in several different forms and is restricted to commelinids and orchids.
methodsWe utilized energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDX/EDS) mapping technology on leaf transverse sections to explore the diverse silica deposition patterns in a range of monocots. The results were evaluated using character optimizations on existing phylogenies.
resultsOur optimization indicates at least two independent evolutionary origins of phytoliths among monocots, with secondary losses in some lineages. Silica that accumulates in the cell lumen occurs mostly in bundle sheath cells or epidermal cells, often associated with sclerenchyma. In Bromeliaceae and Rapateaceae, small phytoliths occur in the walls of occluded epidermal cells overlying sclerenchyma. In Dasypogonaceae, phytoliths accumulate in the lumen of epidermal cells. Cell-wall bound silica occurs in the epidermal cells of some commelinids (Commelinaceae, Cyperaceae and Poaceae). There is a close association between silica deposition and the presence of ferulic acid, except possibly in orchids. Records of high silica concentration in leaves are not always correlated with deposition. We found no silica deposition in leaves of some aquatic commelinids, despite evidence for silica uptake and presence of ferulic acid.
conclusionsOur ongoing comparative investigations using EDX data not only extend our knowledge about biomineral inclusions in plants, but also highlight their structural and biochemical complexity. This study suggests that the diversity and relatively restricted phylogenetic distribution of monocot phytoliths is at least partly attributable to cell chemistry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.