ArticleThe Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association2026
Assessing Medical Student Attentional Bias in Unicoronal Craniosynostosis: An Eye-Tracking Study.
Article in The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectiveUsing a well-established measure of attention, we aimed to objectively identify medical students' gaze patterns when assessing children with/without unicoronal craniosynostosis (UCS) and identify potential diagnostic and educational gaps in their assessment.DesignMedical student participants viewed a series of images of children with/without UCS. Eye movements were recorded using a table-mounted eye-tracking device. Dwell times for 8 interest areas (forehead, brow, eyes, nose, lower face, mouth, left ear, right ear) were compared.ParticipantsThirty medical students (21 males, 9 females, mean age = 29.9 years old) were recruited from the local medical school.Main Outcome MeasureThe main outcome measure was the cumulative dwell times (milliseconds) participants spent within the 8 facial regions (forehead, brow, eyes, nose, lower face, mouth, left ear, right ear).ResultsParticipants spent significantly more time on the brow region (P < 0.001) and less on the nose region (P < 0.05) when viewing UCS images. Furthermore, there were significantly longer dwell times to the side of the forehead contralateral to the fused suture in UCS images (P < 0.05). In control images, participants focused more on the right side of the mouth (P < 0.05). No other significant differences in dwell times were observed.ConclusionThis study demonstrates that medical students exhibit attentional biases when viewing children with UCS and focus on only some of the asymmetries seen in UCS. These findings highlight potential educational gaps emphasizing the need for targeted training in craniofacial assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.