Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40676847›Full record

ArticleBiochemical Society transactions2025

Why are imprints unstable in pluripotent stem cells?

Maria Arez, Simão Teixeira da Rocha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemical Society transactions, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Maria ArezDepartment of Bioengineering, iBB - Institute for Bioengineering and Biosciences, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-5564-3490
Simão Teixeira da RochaDepartment of Bioengineering, iBB - Institute for Bioengineering and Biosciences, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-9683-7942

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) possess the remarkable ability to self-renew and differentiate into nearly any cell type, making them invaluable for both research and therapeutic applications. Despite these powerful attributes, PSCs are vulnerable to genetic and epigenetic instabilities that can undermine their reliability and safety. While genetic abnormalities can be routinely monitored with established guidelines, epigenetic instabilities often go unchecked. Among the most recurrent epigenetic defects in PSCs are errors in genomic imprinting - a process that governs parent-of-origin-specific monoallelic expression of certain genes through differential marking of the two parental alleles by DNA methylation. When disrupted, it becomes a source of a dozen developmental conditions known as imprinting diseases. In PSCs, once imprinting errors arise, they remain throughout cellular differentiation, casting uncertainty over the use of PSC-derived cells for disease modelling and regenerative medicine. In this review, we provide an overview of imprinting defects in both mouse and human PSCs, delving into their origins and consequences. We also discuss potential correction strategies that aim to enhance imprinting stability, ultimately paving the way for safer, more reliable PSC use in research and clinical applications.

Indexed as

DNA methylationepigeneticsgenomic imprintingpluripotencystem cells

Identifiers

PMID40676847
PMCPMC12410003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.