ArticleThe clinical teacher2025
Variation in Students' Experiences and Approaches to Learning During Early Clinical Immersion.
Article in The clinical teacher, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Developing purposeful observation during early clinical exposure in anesthesiology: a cluster-randomized study.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Educational strategies for enhancing medical students' competency in laboratory medicine practice: a scoping review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Variation in Students' Experiences and Approaches to Learning During Early Clinical Immersion.The clinical teacher · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEmphasis is being placed on producing intern-ready graduates who can navigate complex clinical environments. Early clinical immersion seeks to enable this through experiential learning and supported participation in authentic workplaces; however, its educational value remains intangible. Studies have evaluated placement objectives but not other effects in detail. We explored novice students' experiences and approaches to learning during early clinical immersion and factors that enhanced or hindered them.
methodsMedical students at the beginning of their second year undertook 8 weeks of immersive clinical learning to introduce them to hospital settings, enable understanding of hospital workplaces and strengthen clinical assessment and skills. In 2021, focus groups were conducted and data were analysed using theory-informing subjectivist inductive data analysis based on self-regulation learning theory.
resultsFifteen participants described diverse experiences and approaches to learning during early clinical immersion, indicating varying degrees of self-regulated learning. Through goal setting, strategic awareness and behaviour, self-reflection and adaptation and flexibility, some maximised learning opportunities, while others had a more limited experience. Some causal attributes enhanced learning, such as undertaking ward-based learning tasks with nurses, while other attributes hindered it, such as disengaged supervisors and teams.
conclusionsThe quality of students' experience of learning during early clinical immersion is influenced by the degree of self-regulated learning, which affects the approach to learning, plus system barriers and facilitators. Strategies that enable students to enhance self-regulated learning, such as setting and monitoring learning goals with supervisors, may help optimise learning in clinical environments and provide the scaffolds to enhance learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.