ArticleThe plant genome2025
Optimizing genomic prediction with transfer learning under a ridge regression framework.
Article in The plant genome, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Optimizing genomic prediction with transfer learning under a ridge regression framework.The plant genome · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genomic selection (GS) is a predictive plant and animal methodology that allows the selection of plants and animals based on predictions without the need to measure the phenotype. However, its practical application requires challenging prediction accuracy due to the noise observations collected in experiments in these areas. Many strategies and approaches have been proposed to improve the prediction accuracy of this methodology. This paper explores the use of transfer learning in the context of GS. Transfer learning with (1) ridge regression (RR) (Transfer RR) and (2) analytic RR (ARR) (Transfer ARR) were applied from cultivars in the proxy environment to predict those cultivars in the goal environments. Also, we compared the performance of models RR and ARR without transfer learning. We used 11 real multi-environment datasets (wheat and rice) and evaluated them in terms of Pearson's correlation (Cor) and normalized root mean square error (NRMSE). Our study shows empirical evidence that the Transfer RR or Transfer ARR approaches significantly enhanced predictive performance. Across the datasets, Transfer RR (or Transfer ARR) method improved Cor by 22.962% and NRMSE by 5.757%, in comparison to models RR and ARR. These results underscore the potential of Transfer RR (or Transfer ARR) when enhancing predictive accuracy in this context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.