Observational studyCancer science2025
Prognostic and Predictive Value of Machine Learning-Based Biomarker and Pathomics Signatures in Patients With Prostate Cancer.
Observational study in Cancer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The B7 family subgroup reflects tumor cell heterogeneity and patient post-operative prognosis in gallbladder cancer.Biology direct · 2026Article
- Combination of Naples prognostic score and pathological factors for evaluating the long-term prognosis of patients with late-onset colorectal cancer: a multicenter machine learning study.Translational cancer research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recurrence and the potential development of castration resistance after radical prostatectomy (RP) are significant challenges in the management of prostate cancer (PCa). Despite the development of advanced prognostic models, few have been clinically applied. Five machine learning algorithms (LASSO, RSF, SVM-RFE, Boruta, and XGBoost) were used to identify biomarkers for PCa using transcriptome data from multicenters (TCGA, MSKCC, DKFZ, and GSE70770) for constructing and validating the metastasis-associated prognostic risk score (MAPRS), which revealed the molecular biological heterogeneity and was confirmed with in-house histopathological samples. The pathomics score (PSpc), derived from a machine learning framework (XGBoost, RSF, GBM, plsRCox, CoxBoost, Enet, Ridge, LASSO, SVM, and superPC) using hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained digital pathology, quantified tumor morphological heterogeneity. The MAPRS correlated with poorer recurrence-free survival (RFS) and was associated with the tumor microenvironment and pathogenic variants. A higher MAPRS may indicate sensitivity to treatments such as PARP inhibitors, docetaxel, and oxaliplatin. Pathology-based evaluations of MAPRS, PSpc, and their combination effectively predicted RFS in patients who underwent RP. MAPRS also predicted progression-free survival in patients receiving androgen deprivation therapy when combined with clinical indicators, whereas PSpc demonstrated limited efficacy. The digital pathology-based signatures showed superior predictive efficacy compared to other tools. Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry number: ChiCTR2400085748 (June 18, 2024).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.