ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2025
Feasibility of a dietary life skills course aimed at fostering cooking skills and a healthy diet among university students.
Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe transition from living at home to independent university life has been associated with deteriorated health outcomes, and many university students lack cooking skills. Life skills education promotes skills essential to mastering everyday challenges such as planning and preparing healthy meals. We developed a dietary life skills course to foster cooking skills and a healthy diet among university students. This paper describes the feasibility testing of this Skills for Life course.
methodsSkills for Life was feasibility tested as a pre-post intervention without a control group. The course comprised 10 weekly, practical lessons at a university teaching kitchen. Topics included among others: nutrition from a life course perspective and why diet matters, how to stock your kitchen, how to make the most of your student loan, and sustainable food and 'food rescuing'. The emphasis was on how to plan and cook easy, cheap, healthy, tasty, and sustainable meals. The students were encouraged to engage with a course-specific website that included short video lectures, relevant literature, learning activities, recipes, and a podcast. An online survey including background information and a validated dietary screener (MyFoodMonth 1.1) was distributed pre- and post-course. Feasibility questionnaires were distributed after each of the 10 lessons and post-course. Progression criteria were set regarding acceptability (mean value ≥ 4 of 5), demand (30 or more sign up; 20 or more participate), implementation (10 lessons delivered), practicality (intervention delivered within normal working hours) and limited efficacy (no significant adverse effects on participants).
resultsAll progression criteria were met. Sixty-nine students signed up, but the dropout rate was substantial. Twenty-eight students attended at least one lesson, and 14 students attended at least five of the 10 lessons. The overall attendance rate was 49%. The course was well received by the students and was assessed as acceptable. Self-perceived course effects such as a healthier diet, increased knowledge of a healthy diet, and improved cooking skills were reported.
conclusionsThe Skills for Life course is feasible in a university setting. Further research should investigate how to increase participation to be able to explore possible changes in diet quality in a larger sample.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.