ArticleAdvances in rheumatology (London, England)2025
Evaluation of rheumatologists' knowledge of biosimilars.
Article in Advances in rheumatology (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionBiosimilars reduce the cost of biologic therapy without compromising safety and effectiveness. In this study we evaluated Brazilian rheumatologists' knowledge and perceptions of biosimilars.
methodsCross-sectional and descriptive study based on a questionnaire containing 17 items on familiarity, knowledge and perceptions of biosimilars.
resultsAnswers were received from 135 rheumatologists, of whom 97.8% were familiar with biosimilars and 92.5% had at some time prescribed them, but only 47.7% felt comfortable prescribing them to stable patients and 62.2% strongly disagreed with automatic substitution. In addition, 51.9% preferred naive patients when starting treatment with biosimilars.
conclusionDespite the growing acceptance of biosimilars, many physicians remain reluctant. Evidence-based continuing education is essential to clarify these issues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.