Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40676641›Full record

ArticleJournal of eating disorders2025

Development and implementation of a credentialing system for clinicians providing eating disorder care.

Gabriella Heruc, Kim Hurst, Sarah Trobe, Beth Shelton, Emma Spiel, Siân A McLean

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of eating disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gabriella HerucAustralia & New Zealand Academy for Eating Disorders, Sydney, Australia. g.heruc@westernsydney.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6257-6828
Kim HurstSchool of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.
Sarah TrobeNational Eating Disorders Collaboration, Melbourne, Australia.
Beth SheltonTranslational Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia.
Emma SpielNational Eating Disorders Collaboration, Melbourne, Australia.
Siân A McLeanSchool of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.

Funding

Department of Health and Aged Care, Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care, Australian Government
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With eating disorder prevalence increasing in Australia and around the world, it is critical that clinicians are trained in eating disorder treatment and that people with eating disorders, their families and supports can identify suitably trained clinicians. With funding from the Australian Government, the Australia & New Zealand Academy for Eating Disorders (ANZAED) and National Eating Disorders Collaboration partnered to develop and implement a novel credentialing system to recognise dietitians and mental health professionals with a minimum level of knowledge, experience, and training in eating disorder care. This paper aims to describe the development and implementation of this credentialing system, exploring its initial uptake by clinicians. In developing the Credential, initial scoping work included extensive consultation with clinicians, peak professional bodies, and those with lived experience of an eating disorder and their families. Once the criteria for the ANZAED Eating Disorder Credential were established and a custom website built, the Credential opened for applications from clinicians on 24 November 2021. To engage with clinicians, incentive schemes were used, including a limited evidence sunset period encouraging the existing workforce to apply, and professional development programs targeting the upskilling of clinicians new to eating disorder treatment. In the first 19 months of the Credential, 1410 clinicians (including 511 dietitians and 899 mental health professionals) were awarded the Credential. Although there was a small amount of anticipated attrition during the first renewal period, 1275 clinicians remained currently credentialed at 30 June 2023. Overall, most credentialed clinicians were private practitioners, likely motivated by the need for professional recognition. To support program improvements and long-term sustainability, future research will explore the benefits, impacts, and challenges of the credentialing system as perceived by clinicians and people with an eating disorder and their families.

Indexed as

Clinical practiceCliniciansCredentialingEating disordersEating disorder treatmentHealth professionalsMinimum standardsProfessional recognitionWorkforce development

Identifiers

PMID40676641
PMCPMC12272996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.