ArticleInternational journal of health geographics2025
The impacts of various green space types on the adiposity of undergraduate students: a nationwide quasi-experimental study.
Article in International journal of health geographics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Green spaces provide diverse health benefits, and provision of green spaces is often linked to lower incidences of adiposity. Undergraduates, who are at a transitional stage of development, represent a critical population for obesity prevention. However, recent studies suggest that the health effects of green space may vary by type. Furthermore, inferring any causal relationship between green spaces and adiposity using a cross-sectional research design remains challenging. To address these issues, this study utilized a large, representative sample of 21,990 undergraduates from 89 universities across 29 provinces in China, and employed a quasi-experimental approach to explore the impacts of specific green space types on body mass index (BMI). Propensity score matching was used to make the students who were influenced by green spaces comparable to those who were not. A difference-in-differences model was applied to estimate the causal effects of three types of green spaces (trees, bushes, and grass) on BMI. To further explore the underlying mechanisms, we examined two potential mediators: energy expenditure (physical activity) and energy intake (unhealthy food consumption). The results revealed that trees had a negative impact on BMI, whereas bushes and grass had no significant effect. Physical activity serves as a significant mediator linking tree exposure to adiposity changes, while unhealthy food intake showed no statistically significant mediation effect. In the stratified analysis, trees had significantly negative effects only on males. These findings highlight the importance of distinguishing green space types and provide causal evidence linking tree exposure to reduced BMI among undergraduates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.