ArticleBMC nursing2025
Nursing undergraduates' use, readiness, barriers, and perceived effectiveness of online distance learning during COVID-19 in Sri Lanka: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic disrupted traditional learning, presenting unique challenges for nursing undergraduates due to the hands-on nature of their education. Assessing students' readiness, usage of online platforms, and the barriers they face is crucial to evaluating the effectiveness and sustainability of online learning. This study aimed to investigate nursing undergraduates' use of online learning facilities, readiness for online distance learning, and associated factors; to identify the barriers and challenges they faced; and to explore their perceived effectiveness with online distance learning during the COVID-19 pandemic.
methodsThis descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among 137 nursing undergraduates in Sri Lanka. Data were collected using a pretested, validated study instrument, including students' Online Learning Readiness Score (OLRS) distributed through Google Forms. The data were then analysed using descriptive statistics and multivariate analysis of variance.
resultsThe study had a 91.3% response rate (n = 137), with a mean participant age of 24.18 (± 3.45) years. Nearly half (51.8%) accessed online classes via smartphones, and most (62.8%) used mobile data. Key challenges included mobility restrictions (85.4%), lack of face-to-face interaction (82.5%), heavy workloads (81%), household duties (79.6%), and poor internet connectivity (78.8%). The mean Online Learning Readiness Score (OLRS) was 13.95 (± 4.90), with higher scores in self-directed learning and motivation (3.44-3.63). MANOVA revealed a significant gender difference in OLRS (F = 3.932, p < 0.04; Wilks' Lambda = 0.955; η² = 0.028), and significant differences in computer internet self-efficacy across academic years (F = 6.015, p < 0.001; Wilks' Lambda = 0.808; η² = 0.119).
conclusionNursing undergraduates faced several challenges to online learning during COVID-19, including mobility restrictions, low motivation, and poor connectivity. Despite moderate self-directed learning and motivation, overall readiness was low. Readiness varied by gender and academic year, indicating the need for targeted support to improve digital preparedness and engagement. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.