ReviewBMC medical education2025
Soft skills in dental student curricula: an evidence and gap map.
Review in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Soft Skills in the Training of Future Dentists: Perceptions and Perspectives of Final-Year Students.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSoft skills are recognised as essential for dental practitioners, but their integration into dental education is inconsistent. The aim of this evidence and gap map was to explore the use of soft skills teaching initiatives in undergraduate dental education and to clarify the key domains in this research field.
methodsAn extensive search of studies from 2014 to 2024 on the PubMed database was carried out by four researchers. Inclusion criteria covered articles, including both advocacy or position papers, and studies reporting on implemented and evaluated educational interventions in soft skills in undergraduate dental education. The search is aligned with Joanna Briggs Institute and PRISMA-ScR guidelines and based on predefined coding frameworks from the literature.
resultsFrom the 1,449 records initially identified, 317 were included after rigorous examination. There were generally more educational programme description or evaluation papers compared to advocacy articles. More than two-thirds of the included articles were published in pedagogy-focused journals. The papers were classified into four domains (i.e. dentist-patient relationship, cooperation, life balance and clinical reasoning), with most studies falling into the dentist-patient relationship and cooperation domains. Various graphic formats present the results (i.e. a visual map, radar charts, and a geographical map), which provides a comprehensive and accessible representation, thus aiding in the exploration of the identified themes, connections, and key domains in this research field.
conclusionsThis evidence and gap map represents an attempt to capture a picture of existing educational practises relating to soft skills in dentistry teaching and, thus, raise broader questions regarding how soft skills should contribute to redefining the role of dentistry for dentists, patients and society. However, integrating soft skills comes with various challenges, such as the training of educators, the standardisation of content and evaluations, and the development of research evaluating the impacts of soft skills teaching on dentists and patients. Ultimately, it would be beneficial to engage patients in defining the various curriculum items and prioritising the most relevant ones concerning soft skills. This collaborative approach would ensure that the educational content aligns with the needs of patients and helps address larger public health challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.