ArticleBMC nephrology2025
Information needs of kidney transplant patients on social media: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRecent years have seen an increase in internet and social media usage, with individuals turning to these platforms for health-related information. Kidney transplant recipients and candidates are among those who actively engage in sharing their experiences and seeking information online. This study aims to identify the information needs of kidney transplant candidates and recipients based on their social media posts.
methodsA qualitative research design was adopted, focusing on Facebook groups related to kidney transplantation in Türkiye. A total of 496 posts from four active groups, shared between January 1 and December 31, 2023, were analyzed. The data were examined through an inductive approach, where initial codes were developed to identify key themes and sub-themes. Content analysis was used in the evaluation of the data.
resultsContent analysis of 496 posts revealed four major themes: (i) "Encountered Problems," (ii) "Medical Information," (iii) "Organ Need," and (iv) "Procedure." In addition, seventeen sub-themes related to the main themes were identified. The majority of posts belonged to the "Encountered Problems" theme, with the highest number of shares concerning physiological issues. The most frequently shared posts were physiological symptoms, difficulties accessing medications, and emotional distress, especially in relation to transplantation complications and post-operative challenges. Posts also showed a strong demand for medical guidance (e.g., physician recommendations, post-transplant care, nutrition), while ethical concerns, organ donor searches, and procedural uncertainties (e.g. patient selection criteria, retirement prosedure) were also common.
conclusionsThe Individuals who have undergone kidney transplantation or are waiting for transplantation need information on many different physiological and psycho-social issues. Social media has emerged as an important platform where these needs are expressed and peer support is provided. These findings suggest the necessity of implementing personalized education programs for patients and their families and expanding remote care practices such as telehealth services (e.g., tele-nursing and online counseling). CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.